Dark Side: Mad Man Mind
PET (positron emission
tomography) scan is a tool used in radiology to determine the functioning of
the body, specifically small areas the size of a grain of sand in tissues and
organs. It is particularly useful in looking into organs, such as the brain,
that are encased in bone. The PET scan is considered a functional rather than
merely structural scan because it measures the functioning of the brain.
Radioactive molecules that interact with the brain in specific ways are injected
before the scan. They can be sugars, to measure the brain’s metabolism, or
drugs that link to the receptors for various neurotransmitters, to measure the distribution
of those receptors.
In this scan the doctors used an
isotope of fluorine, F-18, bound to a type of glucose taken up by active brain
cells. It remains in the cells and emits positrons, a form of radiation, for
about an hour. The glucose is injected into a vein in the subject’s arm, and
then the subject is slid onto a gurney into the PET scanner until the head is
surrounded by the detectors. The amount of time the “photograph” of the brain
is taken depends on the half-life of the isotope. In the case of F-18 this
exposure time is thirty minutes, so the image that is obtained is a snapshot of
brain activity that occurs in this thirty-minute period. During this time, the
F-18 releases positrons that immediately collide with electrons, resulting in a
release of energy detected in the coils surrounding the head in the PET
scanner. The scanner’s computer software locates the source of all of the collisions,
and is then able to reconstruct a 3-D image of them in the entire brain. We
assign colors to the density of collisions, indicating use of glucose, and thus
brain activity. The darker the area, the harder that part of the brain is
working.
So the doctors at the scan and saw, compared to a healthy brain, a decrease of activity in the orbital cortex and the area around the amygdala. In a healthy brain, this area prevents impulsivity (i.e., it inhibits behavior), so when it is turned off, the person is impulsive. The sicko’s lawyers then told the judge that as a matter of biology, their client couldn’t control himself, and he received life without parole instead of the death penalty.
To better understand exactly what
we saw in these scans and why it was so relevant, you first need to have a
basic understanding of the human brain. The brain is organized in a bewildering
number of ways, even to a silverback neuroscientist. The researcher Floyd Bloom
once called it an “electrified jelly,” which is certainly what it seems like to
a first-year medical student. Neuroanatomists categorize themselves into
“clumpers” and “splitters” based on how they like to organize the brain.
Clumpers prefer to simplify the brain into as few sections as possible, while
splitters divide the brain into thousands of pieces, all with their own Latin
or Greek names. To make things even more confusing, splitters like to throw
into the mix the name of the scientist who first described that brain area, so
we end up with names like “Zuckerkandl’s fasciculus,” “the ventral tegmental
relay zone of Giolli,” and the “nucleus reticularis tegmenti pontis of
Bechterew.” This is one of the reasons medical students are terrified of their
first course in neuroscience. When these brain areas, their connections,
chemistry, and circuitry, are considered together for any adaptive behavior,
for example an infant expressing fear at the sight of a stranger, the
complexity of the brain’s wiring can start to get out of hand. For clinical
sciences the representation of the relevant wiring of the brain can quickly
send one packing to the nearest pub for a cold one. For example, here is a
“simplified” version of the brain circuitry involved in depression.
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.” Everyone
is familiar with the idea that we have a left brain and a right brain. But this
conception is woefully lacking in some important ways. On the next page is a
drawing of the side of the brain at the top left, a view of the top of the brain
looking down from above, and a view of the medial portion of the brain that you
would see if you sliced the brain down the middle.
The most posterior region of the
cortex is dedicated to the visual sensory system, as well as “association”
cortices that have functions more complicated than simple seeing or touching or
hearing, but rather cognitive tasks such as spatial processing. The external
world—up, down, left, right, close up, far away—is mapped onto the cortex in
the upper part of the posterior area, called the superior parietal cortex.
People with damage to this brain area on one side will ignore the other half of
their sensory world. So they may only perceive the numbers on the left side of
a clock dial, but not the right side. Given a blank circle, they will fill in
the numbers on the dial from 1 to 12, but these will all be drawn on just one
half of the clock. If the damage is done to the hemisphere that controls their
nondominant hand, let’s say the right superior parietal cortex for a right-hander
(each hemisphere controls the opposite side of the body), then they will go the
extra step in their “agnosia.” They will be able to move the opposite leg, and
feel a pinch on that leg, but they may ask the doctor or nurse to remove the
leg from the hospital bed because it is foreign and doesn’t belong to their body.
Another function of this
posterior area is the understanding and conceptual creation of language. In the
dominant hemisphere (the left side if you’re righthanded), this language
function enables us to master syntax and grammar, while in the nondominant
hemisphere, this language function allows us to understand the song and rhythm
of language, as well as humor. It appears that the dominant hemisphere function
is more genetically determined, while the nondominant hemisphere function is
more molded by environment. That is, you will learn to mirror the accents and
cadence and patois of speech from your family and friends, but your basic
ability for grammar and syntax is more genetically determined. One tends to
adopt the song and rhythm of speech around the time one reaches puberty, but
the range and capabilities of individuals vary widely.
The anterior, or front, section
is the prefrontal cortex and is responsible for the so-called executive
functions of the brain, including knowing rules, making plans, and enabling
short-term memory. This “scratch pad” memory lasts seconds or tens of seconds
and helps us to remember phone numbers long enough to dial them and tells us,
without looking, where we set our drink while we’re eating or playing poker.
The prefrontal cortex is the brain region most important for the elaboration of
personality and character, and the control of impulse, obsessions, and
antisocial behavior. Besides being the locus of will, the prefrontal cortex is
related to a myriad of functions we consider particularly well developed in
primates, especially humans. These involve what has been called “memory of the
future,” that is, projecting one’s mind into the future to imagine, or
experience, really, how one will remember an act that has not yet taken place.
The lower, or ventral, part of
the prefrontal cortex, largely made up of the orbital cortex and ventromedial
prefrontal cortex, is involved in similar functions, but more those enabling
and disenabling “hot cognition”—emotional memory and socially, ethically, and
morally programmed behaviors. Someone with a highly functioning dorsal
prefrontal system would have superior planning and executive functions, whereas
someone with a highly functioning ventral prefrontal system would have superior
control over impulsive and inappropriate interpersonal and social behaviors.
Likewise, lower functioning in these systems leads to not only a lack of
comprehension of these high-order behaviors, but an inability to control them
under socially inappropriate circumstances.
A dichotomy may exist between
empathy, a fundamental connection with the pain of others and arising very
early in life, and “theory of mind,” a more elaborated medial prefrontal system
that allows us to consider others’ thoughts and beliefs, even if they’re
different from our own. People with autism lack theory of mind but not empathy,
while people with psychopathy lack empathy but not theory of mind. Without
empathy you can still have sympathy, though—the ability to retrieve emotional
memories, including those that can predict what painful event is probably about
to befall another person, and the will to help that person. These brain
circuits mature at different times during development, and although there are
major maturational events that take place in the terrible twos, puberty, late
adolescence, the twenties, and the mid-thirties, some are not completely
integrated until one is in the sixties, which appears to be the typical average
peak time of human insight, cognition, and understanding in many realms of
life.
Acknowledgements:
www.politie.nl and a Chief Inspector – Mr. Henk van Essen©
www.aivd.nl AIVD – Mr. Erik Akerboom ©
Bibliography:
1. Criminal Investigations – Crime Scene
Investigation.2000
2. Forensic Science.2006
3. Techniques of Crime Scene Investigation.2012
4. Forensics Pathology.2001
5. Pathology.2005
6. Forensic DNA Technology (Lewis Publishers,New
York, 1991).
7. The Examination and Typing of Bloodstains in the
Crime Laboratory (U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., 1971).
8. „A Short History of the Polymerase Chain
Reaction". PCR Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology.
9. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (3rd ed.).
Cold Spring Harbor,N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.2001
10. "Antibodies as Thermolabile Switches: High
Temperature Triggering for the Polymerase Chain Reaction".
Bio/Technology.1994
11. Forensic Science Handbook, vol. III (Regents/Prentice
Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993).
12. "Thermostable DNA Polymerases for a Wide Spectrum
of Applications: Comparison of a Robust Hybrid TopoTaq to other enzymes".
In Kieleczawa J. DNA Sequencing II: Optimizing Preparation and Cleanup. Jones
and Bartlett. 2006
13. Nielsen B, et al., Acute and adaptive responses in
humans to exercise in a warm, humid environment, Eur J Physiol 1997
14. Molnar GW, Survival of hypothermia by men immersed in
the ocean. JAMA 1946
15. Paton BC, Accidental hypothermia. Pharmacol Ther 1983
16. Simpson K, Exposure to cold-starvation and neglect, in
Simpson K (Ed): Modem Trends in Forensic Medicine. St Louis, MO, Mosby Co,
1953.
17. Fitzgerald FT, Hypoglycemia and accidental hypothermia
in an alcoholic population. West J Med 1980
18. Stoner HB et al., Metabolic aspects of hypothermia in
the elderly. Clin Sci 1980
19. MacGregor DC et al., The effects of ether, ethanol,
propanol and butanol on tolerance to deep hypothermia. Dis Chest 1966
20. Cooper KE, Hunter AR, and Keatinge WR, Accidental
hypothermia. Int Anesthesia Clin 1964
21. Keatinge WR. The effects of subcutaneous fat and of
previous exposure to cold on the body temperature, peripheral blood flow and
metabolic rate of men in cold water. J Physiol 1960
22. Sloan REG and Keatinge WR, Cooling rates of young
people swimming in cold water. J Appl Physiol 1973
23. Keatinge WR, Role of cold and immersion accidents. In
Adam JM (Ed) Hypothermia – Ashore and Afloat. 1981, Chapter 4, Aberdeen Univ.
Press, GB.
24. Keatinge WR and Evans M, The respiratory and
cardiovascular responses to immersion in cold and warm water. QJ Exp Physiol
1961
25. Keatinge WR and Nadel JA, Immediate respiratory
response to sudden cooling of the skin. J Appl Physiol 1965
26. Golden F. St C. and Hurvey GR, The “After Drop” and
death after rescue from immersion in cold water. In Adam JM (Ed). Hypothermia –
Ashore and Afloat, Chapter 5, Aberdeen Univ. Press, GB 1981.
27. Burton AC and Bazett HC, Study of average temperature
of tissue, of exchange of heat and vasomotor responses in man by means of bath
coloremeter. Am J Physiol 1936
28. Adam JM, Cold Weather: Its characteristics, dangers
and assessment, In Adam JM (Ed).Hypothermia – Ashore and Afloat, Aberdeen Univ.
Press, GB1981.
29. Modell JH and Davis JH, Electrolyte changes in human
drowning victims.Anesthesiology 1969
30. Bolte RG, et al., The use of extracorporeal rewarming
in a child submerged for 66 minutes. JAMA 1988
31. Ornato JP, The resuscitation of near-drowning victims.
JAMA 1986
32. Conn AW and Barker CA: Fresh water drowning and
near-drowning — An update.1984;
33. Reh H, On the early postmortem course of
“washerwoman’s skin at the fingertips.” Z Rechtsmed 1984;
34. Gonzales TA, Vance M, Helpern M, Legal Medicine and
Toxicology. New York, Appleton-Century Co, 1937.
35. Peabody AJ, Diatoms and drowning – A review, Med Sci
Law 1980
36. Foged N, Diatoms and drowning — Once more.Forens Sci
Int 1983
37. "Microscale chaotic advection enables robust
convective DNA replication.". Analytical Chemistry. 2013
38. Sourcebook in Forensic Serology, Immunology, and
Biochemistry (U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice,
Washington, D.C.,1983).
39. C. A. Villee et al., Biology (Saunders College
Publishing, Philadelphia, 2nd ed.,1989).
40. Molecular Biology of the Gene (Benjamin/Cummings
Publishing Company, Menlo Park, CA, 4th ed., 1987).
41. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics (Plenum Press, New
York,1985).
42. Human Physiology. An Integrate. 2016
43. Dumas JL and Walker N, Bilateral scapular fractures
secondary to electrical shock. Arch. Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, 1992; 111(5)
44. Stueland DT, et al., Bilateral humeral fractures from
electrically induced muscular spasm. J. of Emerg. Med. 1989
45. Shaheen MA and Sabet NA, Bilateral simultaneous
fracture of the femoral neck following electrical shock. Injury. 1984
46. Rajam KH, et al., Fracture of vertebral bodies caused
by accidental electric shock. J. Indian Med Assoc. 1976
47. Wright RK, Broisz HG, and Shuman M, The investigation of electrical injuries and deaths. Presented at the meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Science, Reno, NV, February 2000.
Komentarze
Prześlij komentarz