Methodology in Language Learning: Concept
Language
aptitude testing was originally motivated by exactly the same reasons as the
testing of intelligence, namely to identify hopelessly untalented students in
state schools. Two labels of English learning emerged - analytical
and synthetic
The former involves constructing
tasks that tap specific cognitive abilities that are assumed to play a significant
role in language learning; these tasks are in the students’ first language and
usually concern some aspect of verbal intelligence. In contrast, the synthetic
approach involves devising mini learning tasks that the students have to carry
out as part of the test-taking process, and based on their achievement in
learning certain aspects of an artificial language or a rare existing L2,
generalizations are made about the learners’ likely performance in a real
language learning program.
Ever
since the MLAT(The Modern Language Aptitude Test)
and the PLAB (the Pimsleur Language Aptitude
Battery) were introduced, language
aptitude has been
equated in most research studies with the scores of one of these (or
some other, similar) tests and
the tacit understanding in the L2 research
community has been that language
aptitude is what language aptitude tests
measure. Although such a
pragmatic test-based definition might appear
rather unscientific, the fact is
that the study of cognitive abilities has often
been characterized in the past by
such an atheoretical and assessment-based approach in psychology.
These
observations are good illustrations of the fact that if properly conducted, the
trial-and-error method can produce instruments with adequate psychometric
capacities, yet these outcomes are somewhat ad
hoc with two separate attempts in our
case resulting in two rather different instruments that also contain certain
theoretically questionable elements. The other side of the coin is, however,
that reliable instruments that appear to
tap into some psychological construct can subsequently be used to define the
content and the boundaries of the construct in question. This has been, for
example, the dominant route in intelligence research: By submitting various
intelligence test scores to complex multivariate statistical analyses,
researchers were able to specify a number of underlying cognitive abilities
©
University
of Oxford - post gradual studies 2009 'English Language Teaching'
Bibliography:
1) Blundell, Lesley and Stokes,
Jackie, Task listening, Cambridge University Press, 198r.
2) Gore, Lesley, Listening to
Maggie, Longman, 1979.
3) McClintock, John and Stern,
Borje, Let's listen, Heinemann Educational Books, 1974.
4) Maley, Alan and Moulding,
Sandra, Learning to listen, CambridgeUniversity Press, 198 I.
5) Scott, Wendy, Are you
listening?, Oxford University Press, 1980.
6) Stokes, Jacqueline StClair, Elementary
task listening, CambridgeUniversity Press, 1984.
7) Underwood, Mary and Barr,
Pauline, Listeners (series), Oxford University Press, 1980.
8) Abbs, Brian and Jones, T., Cloudsongs, Longman,
1977.
9) Abbs, Brian and York, N., Skyhigh, Longman,
1975.
10) Jones,
Christopher, Back home, Longman, 1980.
11) Kingsbury, Roy, and O'Shea, Patrick, Seasons
and people and other songs,Oxford University Press, 1979.
12) Wilson, Ken, Mister Monday and other
songs for the teaching of English,Longman, 197r.
13) Wilson,
Ken and Morrow, Keith, Goodbye rainbow, Longman, 1974.
14) Seidl, Jennifer and McMordie, W., English
idioms and how to use them, Oxford University Press, 1978.
15) Wilson,
F. P. (ed. ), Oxford Dictionary of English Proverbs, Oxford
University Press, 1970.
16) Brown,
Gillian, Listening to spoken English, Longman, 1977.
17) Brown,
Gillian, 'Understanding spoken language', TESOL Quarterly 12:2,
1978.
18) Brown, Gillian and Yule, George, Teaching
the spoken language, Cambridge University Press, 1983.
19) Byrne,
Donn, 'Listening comprehension', Teaching oral English, Longman,
1976.
20) Crystal,
David and Davy, Derek, Investigating English style, Longman,
1969:
21) Curfs,
Emile, 'Listening deserves better', Modern English Teacher 9:3,
1982.
22) Geddes,
Marion, 'Listening', inK. Johnson and K. Morrow (eds. ),
23) Communication
in the classroom, Longman, 1981. Geddes, Marion and White, Ron, 'The
use of semi-scripted simulated authentic speech and listening
comprehension', Audio-visual Language journal, 1978.
24) Littlewood,
William, Communicative language teaching, Cambridge University
Press, 198 I.
25) Maley, Alan, 'The teaching of listening
comprehension skills', Modern English Teacher, 1978.
26) Porter, Don and Roberts, Jon, 'Authentic
listening activities', English Language Teaching]ournal, 1981.
27) Richards,
Jack C., 'Listening comprehension', TESOL Quarterly, 1983.
28) Rivers, Wilga, 'Hearing and comprehending', Teaching foreign language skills (revised edn.), University of Chicago Press, 1980. Widdowson, Henry, Teaching language as communication, Oxford University Press, 1978. The teaching of listening comprehension, British Council, E.L. T. Documents Special, 1981
Komentarze
Prześlij komentarz