Teachers
Your teachers, no
less than you and your classmates, have personal styles, needs, fears, and
motivations that affect their effectiveness and the quality of their relations
with you. Their work is made more complicated by the fact that they usually act
as group leaders as well as teaching.
The
teacher contributes to the alliance by building a “frame” that promotes a sense
of safety. Reliability, stability of time and place, and maintenance of
appropriate interpersonal boundaries are parts of that frame. The student
participates by becoming open to learning, and admitting flaws and lacks in the
safe place the
effective
teacher provides. Fortunately, teachers, teacher supervisors, trainers, and
students who understand
what is
going on in a classroom can substantially enhance learning effectiveness by
adroit application of interpersonal and group dynamics. And by changing the
culture of dysfunctional groups they benefit not only the current members of the
group but also future members.
It is fortunate that
most teachers and students like each other. This bond is one of the motivators
of learning. In fact, some methodologies, such as counseling–learning, are
built on the teacher and student relationship. The motivating force of the
student–teacher relationship is extremely powerful; it taps deep unconscious
needs on the part of both participants.
Think for a moment
about your favorite teachers. Do you feel a certain bond with them and hope to
please them (and not just for a grade)? Sometimes, of course, things do not go
quite so well. Teacher and student needs can operate at cross-purposes. For
example, a student may want a teacher who provides a great deal of overt
emotional support, with lots of encouragement. In a class with a teacher whose
style is more subject-matter focused, such a student could become frustrated.
The frustration could show up as one of the behaviors described above under
defense mechanisms, which the teacher might find disruptive. The friction could
grow, and neither one would understand the underlying disappointment on the
part of the student and pressure the teacher was feeling to get closer, the paradoxical
result of which might be that the teacher pulls away.
Many students
idealize teachers they like or those who provide the kind of good support that
a functional learning alliance involves.
This can be quite uncomfortable for the teacher, because with idealization
comes the risk of disappointment. A student who feels let down by a teacher who
was once idealized can end updevaluing the teacher. This is a very difficult
situation for both student and teacher and can end up interfering with the
success of their work together.
Bibliography:
1. Brown,
H.D. (2000): Principles of Language Learning and Teaching.
2. S.M.
I L. Selinker. (2008): Second Language Acquisition. An Introductory Course.
3. Leaver,
B.L; Ehrman, M; Shekhtman, B. (2005): Achieving Success in Second Language
Acquisition. CUP
4. B. i J. Williams. (red.) 2007: Theories in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
§ ©

Komentarze
Prześlij komentarz