The Offender’s Taxonomies
Research in the
area of criminal profiling has been largely preoccupied with the development of
offender taxonomies and principles relevant to the profiling of violent crimes.
Seemingly overlooked, however, has been any systematic and empirically based
examination of the components and processes involved in the construction of a
criminal profile.
Although it is
commonly believed that criminal profiling involves intensive expert analysis of
investigative case material, the literature in the field has failed to examine
how differing forms of case material may affect this analysis and thus the
construction of a criminal profile. For example, how much and what types of
information are needed for the proficient (i.e., accurate) construction of a
criminal profile? Additionally, systematic consideration of the cognitive
functions involved in the assessment of case materials for the construction of
a criminal profile has largely escaped study.
One of the
fundamental purposes of a criminal profile is to present information describing
the characteristics of the probable offender of a crime. Various lists
prescribing the types of information commonly thought to be contained in
criminal profiles have been proposed. The profiles constructed by the expert
profilers generally contained more information relating to the crime behaviors
and non-physical descriptive features of the probable offender than any† of the
compared groups. However, no statistically significant differences were found
in the amount of information concerning the offender’s physical features that
the expert profilers predicted in comparison with any of the other groups. It
seems reasonable to assume that a relationship probably exists between the type
of case materials available and the way such materials are assessed for the
purpose of constructing a criminal profile. Consequently, as a starting point
for exploring the mechanisms involved in the construction of a criminal
profile, examination of the influence, if any, case materials may have on the
accurate construction of a profile was considered. It was this issue the second
study set out to investigate. Visual
material in the context of the study refers to graphical material that
generally depicts physical aspects of a human being, object, or place and thus
includes, but is not limited to, such things as schematic diagrams and
photographs of any autopsy or crime scene. In a similar vein, narrative
material is defined as any information communicated in some type of written
format and thus includes, but is again not limited to, such items as police,
forensic expert, or witness statements.
A simple test of
the influence these differing forms of case material might have involves the
segregation of case materials by this distinction and observing any differences
this segregation may have on the proficient (i.e., accurate) construction of a
criminal profile. From a purely descriptive perspective, all of the groups who
were provided with at least some case materials surpassed the control group,
which merely guessed and/or relied on stereotypical notions of a murderer in
responding to the questionnaire. However, the only group that surpassed the
control condition at a statistically significant level was the group that was
provided with all case materials. In addition to both the original murder and
arson survey forms, a separate questionnaire was also included, which the
respondent was required to answer immediately after they had completed the
initial questionnaire. One important difference was that the various sections
of the questionnaires were to be completed and sealed in an envelope before a
participant could progress to answer the next section. Consequently,
participants were instructed to complete these additional sections of the
experiment without the benefit of referring back to the case materials or their
previous profile.
Accordingly, it
would appear that one cognitive function that does not appear to be related to
proficient (i.e., accurate) profiling is the mere amount of case information an
individual can recollect. Somewhat mixed findings, however, emerge with respect
to profiling accuracy and the number of items nominated as relevant to profile
construction. In this circumstance, a statistically significant incremental
relationship was found to exist but only in the context of the arson case. The
fact that a criminal profile, as constructed by an expert profiler, is likely
to be larger than that generated by an individual from another skill-based
group does not seem particularly enlightening. Indeed, quantity does not
necessarily equate with quality in terms of the accuracy of a criminal profile.
The ideal criminal profile should arguably be succinct and insightful in
identifying potential suspects.
Acknowledgements:
The
Police Department;
www.politie.nl
and a Chief Inspector – Mr. Erik Akerboom ©
Bibliography:
1. Criminal
Investigations – Crime Scene Investigation.2000
2. Forensic
Science.2006
3. Techniques
of Crime Scene Investigation.2012
4. Forensics
Pathology.2001
5. Pathology.2005
6. Forensic
DNA Technology (Lewis Publishers,New York, 1991).
7. The
Examination and Typing of Bloodstains in the Crime Laboratory (U.S. Department
of Justice, Washington, D.C., 1971).
8. „A
Short History of the Polymerase Chain Reaction". PCR Protocols. Methods in
Molecular Biology.
9. Molecular
Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (3rd ed.). Cold Spring Harbor,N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor
Laboratory Press.2001
10. "Antibodies
as Thermolabile Switches: High Temperature Triggering for the Polymerase Chain
Reaction". Bio/Technology.1994
11. Forensic
Science Handbook, vol. III (Regents/Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993).
12. "Thermostable
DNA Polymerases for a Wide Spectrum of Applications: Comparison of a Robust
Hybrid TopoTaq to other enzymes". In Kieleczawa J. DNA Sequencing II:
Optimizing Preparation and Cleanup. Jones and Bartlett. 2006
13. Nielsen
B, et al., Acute and adaptive responses in humans to exercise in a warm, humid
environment, Eur J Physiol 1997
14. Molnar
GW, Survival of hypothermia by men immersed in the ocean. JAMA 1946
15. Paton
BC, Accidental hypothermia. Pharmacol Ther 1983
16. Simpson
K, Exposure to cold-starvation and neglect, in Simpson K (Ed): Modem Trends in
Forensic Medicine. St Louis, MO, Mosby Co, 1953.
17. Fitzgerald
FT, Hypoglycemia and accidental hypothermia in an alcoholic population. West J
Med 1980
18. Stoner
HB et al., Metabolic aspects of hypothermia in the elderly. Clin Sci 1980
19. MacGregor
DC et al., The effects of ether, ethanol, propanol and butanol on tolerance to
deep hypothermia. Dis Chest 1966
20. Cooper
KE, Hunter AR, and Keatinge WR, Accidental hypothermia. Int Anesthesia
Clin 1964
21. Keatinge
WR. The effects of subcutaneous fat and of previous exposure to cold on the
body temperature, peripheral blood flow and metabolic rate of men in cold
water. J Physiol 1960
22. Sloan
REG and Keatinge WR, Cooling rates of young people swimming in cold
water. J Appl Physiol 1973
23. Keatinge
WR, Role of cold and immersion accidents. In Adam JM (Ed) Hypothermia – Ashore
and Afloat. 1981, Chapter 4, Aberdeen Univ. Press, GB.
24. Keatinge
WR and Evans M, The respiratory and cardiovascular responses to immersion in
cold and warm water. QJ Exp Physiol 1961
25. Keatinge
WR and Nadel JA, Immediate respiratory response to sudden cooling of the
skin. J Appl Physiol 1965
26. Golden
F. St C. and Hurvey GR, The “After Drop” and death after rescue from immersion
in cold water. In Adam JM (Ed). Hypothermia – Ashore and Afloat, Chapter 5,
Aberdeen Univ. Press, GB 1981.
27. Burton
AC and Bazett HC, Study of average temperature of tissue, of exchange of heat
and vasomotor responses in man by means of bath coloremeter. Am J Physiol
1936
28. Adam
JM, Cold Weather: Its characteristics, dangers and assessment, In Adam JM
(Ed).Hypothermia – Ashore and Afloat, Aberdeen Univ. Press, GB1981.
29. Modell
JH and Davis JH, Electrolyte changes in human drowning victims.Anesthesiology
1969
30. Bolte
RG, et al., The use of extracorporeal rewarming in a child submerged for 66
minutes. JAMA 1988
31. Ornato
JP, The resuscitation of near-drowning victims. JAMA 1986
32. Conn
AW and Barker CA: Fresh water drowning and near-drowning — An update.1984;
33. Reh
H, On the early postmortem course of “washerwoman’s skin at the fingertips.” Z
Rechtsmed 1984;
34. Gonzales
TA, Vance M, Helpern M, Legal Medicine and Toxicology. New York,
Appleton-Century Co, 1937.
35. Peabody
AJ, Diatoms and drowning – A review, Med Sci Law 1980
36. Foged
N, Diatoms and drowning — Once more.Forens Sci Int 1983
37. "Microscale
chaotic advection enables robust convective DNA replication.". Analytical
Chemistry. 2013
38. Sourcebook
in Forensic Serology, Immunology, and Biochemistry (U.S. Department of Justice,
National Institute of Justice, Washington, D.C.,1983).
39. C.
A. Villee et al., Biology (Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia, 2nd
ed.,1989).
40. Molecular
Biology of the Gene (Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Menlo Park, CA, 4th
ed., 1987).
41. Molecular
Evolutionary Genetics (Plenum Press, New York,1985).
42. Human
Physiology. An Integrate. 2016
43. Dumas
JL and Walker N, Bilateral scapular fractures secondary to electrical shock.
Arch. Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, 1992; 111(5)
44. Stueland
DT, et al., Bilateral humeral fractures from electrically induced muscular
spasm. J. of Emerg. Med. 1989
45. Shaheen
MA and Sabet NA, Bilateral simultaneous fracture of the femoral neck following
electrical shock. Injury. 1984
46. Rajam
KH, et al., Fracture of vertebral bodies caused by accidental electric shock.
J. Indian Med Assoc. 1976
47. Wright
RK, Broisz HG, and Shuman M, The investigation of electrical injuries and
deaths. Presented at the meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Science,
Reno, NV, February 2000.

Komentarze
Prześlij komentarz