Defense mechanisms -- Emotional equilibrium
Emotional equilibrium and
self-esteem are vital to all of us, and we employ a number of ways to protect
them in ourselves. A term that is frequently used by psychologists for these
activities is defence mechanisms. Everyone uses defence mechanisms, every day;
they are part of normal life.
(…)Defence mechanisms
are essential for softening failures, protecting us from
otherwise
overwhelming anxiety, and maintaining our sense of personal
worth . . . every normal person uses all of
them – immature or mature –
in greater or lesser
degree all the time. Much of the time, we use defence
mechanisms
appropriately, but . . . [if] inappropriately used, they do not produce
realistic adaptation,
and sometimes they involve others in inappropriate
ways. (…)
What does this mean? It means
that all students have ways of “defending” themselves against psychological
discomfort. What these are will vary from student to student. One student may
withdraw emotional energy; another might deflect attention onto socializing
with students whose company enhances his sense of his worth. Yet another might
refuse to invest emotional energy in language learning. without intrinsic motivation
(i.e. personal interest). Some students may avoid becoming involved with a new
culture in order to avoid being disappointed. And so on. There are a number of
ways of categorizing all these kinds of behaviours. We suggest four principal
categories, although other authors may suggest others. These are:
- flight or withdrawal behaviours;
- aggressive or “fight” behaviours;
- group manipulation behaviours;
- compromise behaviours.
You have probably engaged in some
of these behaviours at one time or another; nearly everyone does. These are the
things that you do to avoid uncomfortable situations. One example of these
kinds of defence mechanisms is test preparation. Let us say that you have a
test tomorrow, which will cover verbal forms, which you do not understand well.
Instead of working at understanding these forms, you might spend more time with
the meaning of the verbs and the various parts of the verbs (stems, suffixes,
etc.) even though you already understand these things. In some cases, you might
decide to put off studying and eat supper first. You might, in this way, add other
activities and fritter away much of your study time. Another example is “flight/withdrawal”
reaction to a test score. Instead of trying to figure out what you did wrong,
you may ignore a bad grade on a test. You might even blame the teacher for the
grade if you think he or she does not like you or underrates your skills. Rather
than learning why you made the grammar mistakes that you did, you might excuse
the grade by saying that it is meaningless to you because the test was on
grammar and what is most important to you is developing a large vocabulary. Aggressive/fight
behaviours are just the opposite of flight/withdrawal behaviours. They meet the
problem head-on, but not in a particularly rational way. You may have
experienced some of these kinds of behaviours from your classmates. (Perhaps
you have even engaged in them yourself.) Perhaps a classmate laughed at your
pronunciation or complained that you hogged the speaking time. This is one
example of aggressive/fight behaviours. These behaviours are very typical in
elementary and high school programs, in which students try to establish some
kind of pecking order. Cliques form, and there are some students who are “in”
and others who are “out.” This same kind of behaviour can continue into college
although it is usually less overt at this level. Sometimes, though, when some
students are not succeeding well at learning a foreign language, they will
start to form subgroups within the class. They may pick on a particularly
gifted or untalented learner, drawing attention away from their own lack of
success.
Compromise behaviours are a mature
form of defence mechanisms. Some are anticipating difficulties and preparing
for them. If you think you did poorly on the test, be prepared for a low grade
and make plans to learn from the experience – and to learn whatever language
points you missed. If you make a funny mistake and people instinctively laugh,
laugh along with them; they cannot laugh at you if you are
laughing along with
them. Rather than picking on a slower learner in
the class, you and your classmates could tutor the learner. Thinking of the class as a whole needing to perform well
can contribute to your own better performance.
Bibliography:
1. Brown,
H.D. (2000): Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. White Plains, NY:
Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. Gass,
2. S.M. I
L. Selinker. (2008): Second Language Acquisition. An Introductory Course. New
York: Routledge. VanPatten,
3. Leaver,
B.L; Ehrman, M; Shekhtman, B. (2005): Achieving Success in Second Language
Acquisition. CUP
4. B. i J.
Williams. (red.) 2007: Theories in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, New
Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
§ ©
Komentarze
Prześlij komentarz