The Japanese Middle Class - 中流階級





The cultural observation mirrored and engendered the emergence of another important trend in the historiography of prewar Japan: the decentering of the state as a transformative force and the foregrounding of new social groups and individuals crucial to Japan’s modern social revolutions. It revealed the making of urban society, in particular the emergence of social icons, institutions, and ideologies that defined prewar Japanese society and, moreover, became enduring features of the twentieth-century Japanese social landscape. Their work centers on the emergence of a social group loosely termed the middle classes, a subject of historical inquiry that, until recently, was largely the province of scholars of postwar Japan. New modern social norms and ideals emerged, whether the twentieth-century incarnations of family and childhood, ideals of masculinity and femininity, or practices of leisure and consumerism, in the urban milieu of so-called prewar middle-class society. Their focus, temporally speaking, is the late Meiji and Taisho¯ years (1890s to 1920s) and, geographically speaking, Tokyo. Their human focus is a new group of academicians and professionals who functioned as modernity’s middlemen. Neither representatives of the state nor members of the everyday population, these people were educated elites who became spokespeople for and shapers of a new middle-class society. Whether public intellectuals, university professors, child psychologists, or magazine editors, they investigated topics ranging from domestic architecture to sexology to hygiene, often as discrete fields of study (or gaku); disseminated their opinions to a larger public, often in the pages of mass circulation magazines and books; and saw their views consumed by an emerging middle-class population. In the process, these influential figures shaped the urban imagination and transformed the way people thought, acted, and behaved.



It was characterized, for instance, by the details ‘‘the public construction of the private sphere,’’ as a cadre of early twentieth century intellectuals, architects, and reformers worked to redesign domestic interiors and, in the process, reshape the notion of family and home for a new Japan. Crucial to the influence of modernity’s middlemen were new urban institutions, sites where communities and hierarchies were (re)produced, modern forms of knowledge disseminated, and modern identities fashioned. The mass media was an institution critical to the building and bounding of a middle-class society, and scholars such as Earl Kinmonth, James Huffman, Barbara Sato, and Jordan Sand have begun to examine the role of the mass media as both mirror and maker of social change. Other urban institutions, from the cafe to the department store to higher schools, also played an important yet underexamined role in stratifying society, creating social groups, and offering individuals new sources of identity so-called - the prewar institution of elite higher schools (ko¯to¯ gakko¯) ‘‘eased the transition from government by a hereditary feudal social class to government by a new middle-class status group of academic achievers.’’





A pre-1945 middle class, while tending to focus on the words of its spokespeople, has nonetheless rendered a picture of prewar society full of heretofore unrecognized opportunities for mobility – geographic, social, economic, educational – among a widening swath of the population. This type of work broadens our understanding of modern social change, for it highlights the newfound prospects that modernity offered to the individual. By focusing on the emergence of the ideal of risshin shusse (‘‘success in life’’) and the iconic male corporate worker known as the ‘‘salaryman,’’ the prewar Japanese society was a land where meritocratic principles mixed with dreams of social mobility to produce a stratum of individuals committed to getting ahead in the world. For these types, self-centered aspiration, not nationalist fervor, was the primary motivator of individual action. The field of women’s history has also brought to light women’s place as individual opportunists within urban society.

Japan’s modern social transformation oppressed women, newer work on women’s history; ‘‘Was there not room within the confines of the nation-state for urban women to find agency – be it in the form of changing fashions; attitudes toward work, love, and sexuality; marriage and the family; communication; or personal self-fulfillment?’. Namely there are various lives of women; the era housewives, working women, and modern girls and makes clear how modernity opened new avenues for individual expression and social advancement.


Bibligraphy:

1.    "Polish orphans". Tsuruga city. Retrieved October 3, 2010.
2.    Jump up ^ Hane, Mikiso, Modern Japan: A Historical Survey (Oxford: Westview Press, 1992) 234.
3.    "150回国会 政治倫理の確立及び公職選挙法改正に関する特別委員会 12号 平成121116日(木曜日)". House of Representatives of Japan. November 16, 2000. Retrieved October 10, 2009.
4.    "戦間期台湾地方選挙に関する考察". 古市利雄. 台湾研究フォーラム 【台湾研究論壇】. Retrieved October 10, 2009.
5.    Herbert Bix, Hirohito and the Making of Modern Japan, 2001, p. 284
6.    David C. Earhart, Certain Victory, 2008, p.63
7.    "Question 戦前の日本における対ユダヤ人政策の基本をなしたと言われる「ユダヤ人対策要綱」に関する史料はありますか。また、同要綱に関する説明文はありますか。". Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. Retrieved October 2, 2010.
8.    "猶太人対策要綱". Five Ministers Council. Japan Center for Asian Historical Record. December 6, 1938. p.36/42. Retrieved October 2, 2010.
9.    Stephen C. McCaffrey (September 22, 2004). Understanding International Law. AuthorHouse. pp. 210–229.
10.   "Abe questions sex slave 'coercion'". BBC News. March 2, 2007. Retrieved May 2, 2010.
11.     Yoshiaki Yoshimi and Seiya Matsuno, Dokugasusen Kankei Shiryō II (Materials on poison gas Warfare II), Kaisetsu, Hōkan 2, Jūgonen sensô gokuhi shiryōshū, Funi Shuppankan, 1997, pp. 25–29
12.   Daniel Barenblatt, A Plague upon Humanity, 2004, pp. Xii, 173.
13.   Hal Gold, Unit 731 Testimony, 2003, p. 109.
14.   Drayton, Richard (May 10, 2005). "An Ethical Blank Cheque: British and U.S. mythology about the second world war ignores our own crimes and legitimises Anglo-American war making". The Guardian.
15.   Clay, Jr. Silent Victory (New York: Bantam, 1976).
16.   Morison, S. E. U.S. Navy in World War Two.
17.   Peattie 2007, p. 188-189.
18.   L, Klemen (1999–2000). "Rear-Admiral Takeo Kurita". Forgotten Campaign: The Dutch East Indies Campaign 1941–1942. 
19.    Jump up ^ Evans & Peattie 1997, p. 492.
20.    ^ Jump up to: a b "Creating military power: the sources of military effectiveness". Risa Brooks, Elizabeth A. Stanley (2007). Stanford University Press. p.41. ISBN 0-8047-5399-7
21.    Jump up ^ Powers, D. (2011): Japan: No Surrender in World War Two BBC History (17 February 2011).
22.    Jump up ^ Robert S. Burrell, "Breaking the Cycle of Iwo Jima Mythology: A Strategic Study of Operation Detachment," Journal of Military History Volume 68, Number 4, October 2004, pp. 1143–1186 and rebuttal in Project MUSE

Komentarze

Popularne posty z tego bloga

Dark Side: Some Kind of Justice From Behind The Grave

Methodology in Language Learning: The Ehrman & Leaver Construct

Under the Microscope: The Formation of Adipocere