The Celts, The Romans – The Roman Life




It has a milder climate than much of the European mainland because it lies in the way of the Gulf Stream, which brings warm water and winds from the Gulf of Mexico. Within Britain there are differences of climate between north and south, east and west. The north is on average 5°C cooler than the south. Annual rain fall in the east is on average about 600 mm, while in man y part s of the west it is more than double that. The countryside is varied also. The north and west are mountainous or hilly. Much of the south and east is fairly flat, or low-lying. This means that the south and east on the whole have better agricultural conditions, and it is possible to harvest crops in early August, two months earlier than in the north. So it is not surprising that southeast Britain has always been the most populated part of the island. For this reason it has always had the most political power. Britain is an island, and Britain's history has been closely connected with the sea. Until modern times it was as easy to travel across water as it was across land, where roads were frequently unusable. At moments of great danger Britain has been saved from danger by its surrounding seas. The Ice Age was not just one long equally cold period. There were warmer times when the ice cap retreated, and colder periods when the ice cap reach ed as far south as the River Thames. Our first evidence of human life is a few stone tools, dating from one of the warmer period s, about 250, 000 BC. These simple objects show that there were two different kinds of inhabitant. The earlier group made their too ls from flakes of flint, similar in kind to stone tools found across the north European plain as far as Russia. The ice advanced again and Britain became hardly habit able until another milder period, probably around 50,000 BC. During this time a new type of human being seems to have arrived, who was the ancestor of the modern British. These people looked similar to the modern British, but were probably smaller and had a life span of only about thirty years. Around 10, 000 BC, as the Ice Age drew to a close, Britain was peopled by small groups of hunters, gatherers and fishers. Few had settled homes, and they seemed to have followed herds of deer which provided them with food and clothing. By about 5000 BC Britain had finally become an island, and had also become heavily forested. For the wanderer-hunter culture this was a disaster, for the cold- loving deer and other animals on which they lived largely died out. About 3000 BC Neolithic (or New Stone Age ) people crossed the narrow sea from Europe in small round boats of bent wood covered with animal skins. They probably came from either the Iberian (Spanish) peninsula or even the North African coast. They were small, dark, and long-headed people, and may be the forefathers of dark-haired inhabitants of Wal es and Cornwall today. They settled in the western parts of Britain and Ireland, from Cornwall at the southwest end of Britain all the way to the far north. The great "public works" of this time, which needed a huge organization of labor, tell us a little of how prehistoric Britain was developing. The earlier of these works were great "barrows", or burial mounds, made of earth or stone. Most of these barrows are found on the chalk uplands of south Brita in. Today these upland s have poor soil and few trees, but they were not like that then . After 3000 BC the chalkland people started building great circles of earth banks and ditches. Inside, they built wooden buildings and stone circles. These "henges", as they are called, were centers of religious, political and economic power. By far the most spectacular, both then and now, was Stonehenge, which was built in separate stages over a period of more than a thousand years. The precise purposes of Stonehenge remain a mystery, but during the second phase of building, after about 2400 BC, huge bluestones were brought to the site from south Wales. This could only have been achieved because the political authority of the area surrounding Stonehenge was recognized over a very large area, indeed probably over the whole of the British Isles. The movement of these bluestones was an extremely important event, the story of which was passed on from gene rat ion to gene ration. Three thousand years later, these unwritten memories were recorded in Geoffrey of Monrnourh's History of Britain, written in 1136. Stonehenge was almost certainly a sort of capital, to which the chiefs of other groups came from all over Britain. Certainly, earth or stone henges were built in many part s of Brita in, as far as the Orkney Islands north of Scotland, and as far south as Cornwall. They seem to have been copies of the great Stonehenge in the south. In Ireland the center of prehistoric civilization grew around the River Boyne and at Tara in Ulster. After 2400 BC new groups of people arrived in southeast Britain from Europe . The y were round headed and strongly built, taller than Neolithic Britons. It is not known whether they invaded by armed force, or whether they were invited by Neolithic Britons because of their military or metal working skills. Their influence was soon felt and, as a result, they became leaders of British society. Their arrival is marked by the first individual graves, furnished with pottery beakers, from which these people get their name: the "Beaker" people. The Beaker people prob ably spoke an Indo-European language. They seem to have brought a single culture to the who le of Britain. They also brought skills to make bronze too ls and these began to replace stone ones. But they accepted man y of the old ways. Stonehenge remained the most important center until 1300 BC. The Beaker people's richest graves were there, and they added a new circle of thirty stone columns, this time connected by stone lintels, or cross-pieces. British society continued to be centered on a number of henges across the countryside. Around 700 BC, another group of people began to arrive. Many of them were tall, and had fair or red hair and blue eyes. These were the Celts, who probably came from central Europe or further east, from southern Russia, and had moved slowly westwards in earlier centuries. The Celts were technically advanced. The Celts are important in British history because They are the ancestors of many of the people in Highland Scotland, Wales, Ireland, and Cornwall today. The Iberian people of Wales and Cornwall took on the new Celtic culture. Celtic languages, which have been continuously used in some areas since that time, they are still spoken. The British today they are often described as Anglo-Saxon. It would be better to call them Anglo-Celt. The name "Britain" comes from the word "Pretani ", the Greco-Roman word for the inhabitant s of Brita in. The Romans mispronounced the word and called the island "Britannia". The British Celts were giving them food, and allowing them to hide in Britain. There was another reason. The Celts used cattle to pull their ploughs and this meant that richer, heavier land could be farmed. Under the Celts Britain had become an important food producer because of its mild climate. It now exported corn and animals, as well as hunting dogs and slaves, to the European mainland. The Romans could make use of British food for their own army fighting the Gauls. The Romans brought the skills of reading and writing to Britain. The written word was important for spreading ideas and also for establishing power. As early as AD 80, as one Roman at the time noted, the governor Agricola “trained the sons of chiefs in the liberal arts …” . The result was that the people who used to reject Latin began to use it in speech and writing. Further the wearing of our national dress came to be valued and the toga [the Roman cloak] came into fashion. While the Celtic peasantry remained illiterate and only Celtic speaking, a number of town dwellers spoke Latin and Greek with ease, and the richer landowners in the country almost certainly used Latin. Julius Caesar first came to Britain in 55 BC, but it was not until almost a century later, in AD 43, that a Roman army actually occupied Britain. The Romans were determined to conquer the whole island. They had little difficulty, apart from Boadicea's revolt, because they had a better trained army and because the Celtic tribes fought among themselves. The Romans considered the Celts as war-mad, "high spirited and quick for battle", a description some would still give the Scots, Irish and Welsh today.

The Romans established a Romano-British culture across the southern half of Britain, from the River Humber to the River Severn . This part of Brita in was inside the empire. Beyond were the upland areas, under Roman control but not developed. These areas were watched from the towns of York, Chester and Caerleon in the western pen insula of Britain that later became known as Wales. Each of these towns was held by a Roman legion of about 7,000 men. The total Roman army in Britain was about 40, 000 men.  The Romans left about twenty large towns of about 5, 000 inhabitants, and almost one hundred smaller ones. Many of these towns were at first army camps, and the Latin word for camp, castra, has remained part of many town names to this day (with the ending chester, caster or cesrer): Gloucester, Leicester, Doncaster, Winchester, Chester, Lancaster and many others besides. These towns were built with stone as well as wood, and had planned streets, markets and shops. Some buildings had central heating. They were connected by roads which were so well built that they survived when later roads broke up. These roads continued to be used long after the Romans left, and became the main roads of modern Britain. In some ways life in Roman Britain seems very civilized. but it was also hard for all except the richest. The bodies buried in a Roman graveyard at York show that life expectancy was low. Half the entire population died between the ages of twenty and forty. While 15 percent died before reaching the age of twenty. The Romans had brought tremendous changes to the country. The new wave of invaders challenged it all.



Bibliography:

1.    Clare Oliver (2003). Great Britain. Black Rabbit Books. ISBN 978-1-58340-204-7.
2.    Snyder, Christopher A. (2003). The Britons. Blackwell Publishing. ISBN 0-631-22260-X.
3.    Corrain, Donnchadh, Professor of Irish History at University College Cork (1 November 2001). "Chapter 1: Prehistoric and Early Christian Ireland". In Foster, R F. The Oxford History of Ireland. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-280202-X.
4.    Freeman, Philip (2001). Ireland and the classical world. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press. p. 65. ISBN 0-292-72518-3.
5.    Gräslund, Bo (2005). "Traces of the early humans". Early humans and their world. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-35344-1.
6.    Lacey, Robert. Great Tales from English History. New York: Little, Brown & Co, 2004. ISBN 0-316-10910-X.
7.    Ball, Martin John (1994). The Celtic Languages. Routledge. ISBN 0-415-01035-7.
8.    Butler, Alban (1997). Butler's Lives of the Saints. Continuum International Publishing Group. ISBN 0-86012-255-7.
9.    Frodin, D. G. (2001). Guide to Standard Floras of the World. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-79077-8.
10. Spencer, Colin (2003). British Food: An Extraordinary Thousand Years of History. Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-13110-0.
11. Andrews, Robert (2004). The Rough Guide to Britain. Rough Guides Ltd. ISBN 1-84353-301-4.
12. Dawkins, Peter (2004). The Shakespeare Enigma. Polair Publishing. ISBN 0-9545389-4-3.
13. Major, John (2004). History in Quotations. Cassell. ISBN 0-304-35387-6.
14. Else, David (2005). Great Britain. Lonely Planet. ISBN 1-74059-921-7.
15. Kaufman, Will; Slettedahl, Heidi Macpherson (2005). Britain and the Americas: Culture, Politics, and History. ABC-Clio. ISBN 1-85109-431-8.
16. Oppenheimer, Stephen (2006). Origins of the British. Carroll & Graf. ISBN 0-7867-1890-0. Room, Adrian (2006). Placenames of the World. McFarland. ISBN 0-7864-2248-3.
17. Massey, Gerald (2007). A Book of the Beginnings, Vol. 1. Cosimo. ISBN 1-60206-829-1.

Komentarze

Popularne posty z tego bloga

Sitting Bull

Methodology in Language Learning: The Ehrman & Leaver Construct

Under The Microscope – Shoves You Off At Once